Long-term safety and effectiveness of roflumilast cream 0.3% in adults with chronic plaque psoriasis: A 52-week, phase 2, open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy and/or safety profiles limit topical psoriasis treatments. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate long-term effects of once-daily roflumilast cream 0.3% in patients with psoriasis. METHODS: In this open-label phase 2 trial, adult patients (N = 332) with psoriasis who completed the phase 2b parent trial or were newly enrolled applied roflumilast once-daily for 52 weeks. Safety and effectiveness were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 244 patients (73.5%) completed the trial; 13 patients (3.9%) discontinued due to adverse events (AEs) and 3 (0.9%) due to lack of efficacy. Twelve patients (3.6%) reported treatment-related AEs; none were serious. ≥97% of patients had no irritation. No tachyphylaxis was observed with 44.8% of the patients achieving Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) Clear or Almost Clear at Week 52. LIMITATIONS: Intertriginous-IGA and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) were not evaluated in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this long-term trial, once-daily roflumilast cream was well-tolerated and efficacious up to 64 weeks in patients in the earlier trial, suggesting it is suitable for chronic treatment, including the face and intertriginous areas.

Efficacy of Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, in Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Current topical treatment options for seborrheic dermatitis are limited by efficacy and/or safety. Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in adult patients with seborrheic dermatitis affecting the scalp, face, and/or trunk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter (24 sites in the US and Canada) phase 2a, parallel group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 12, 2019, and August 21, 2020. Participants were adult (aged ≥18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis for a 3-month or longer duration and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 or greater (at least moderate), affecting 20% or less body surface area, including scalp, face, trunk, and/or intertriginous areas. Data analysis was performed from September to October 2020. Interventions: Once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3% (n = 154), or vehicle foam (n = 72) for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was IGA success, defined as achievement of IGA score of clear or almost clear plus 2-grade improvement from baseline, at week 8. Secondary outcomes included IGA success at weeks 2 and 4; achievement of erythema score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; achievement of scaling score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; change in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score from baseline; and WI-NRS success, defined as achievement of 4-point or greater WI-NRS score improvement in patients with baseline WI-NRS score of 4 or greater. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: A total of 226 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [16.8] years; 116 men, 110 women) were randomized to roflumilast foam (n = 154) or vehicle foam (n = 72). At week 8, 104 (73.8%) roflumilast-treated patients achieved IGA success compared with 27 (40.9%) in the vehicle group (P < .001). Roflumilast-treated patients had statistically significantly higher rates of IGA success vs vehicle at week 2, the first time point assessed. Mean (SD) reductions (improvements) on the WI-NRS at week 8 were 59.3% (52.5%) vs 36.6% (42.2%) in the roflumilast and vehicle groups, respectively (P < .001). Roflumilast was well tolerated, with the rate of adverse events similar to that of the vehicle foam. Conclusions and Relevance: The results from this phase 2a randomized clinical trial of once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3%, demonstrated favorable efficacy, safety, and local tolerability in the treatment of erythema, scaling, and itch caused by seborrheic dermatitis, supporting further investigation as a nonsteroidal topical treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04091646.

Long-term safety and disease control with ruxolitinib cream in atopic dermatitis: Results from two phase 3 studies.

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib cream demonstrated safety and efficacy over 8 weeks in 2 double-blind phase 3 atopic dermatitis studies (NCT03745638/NCT03745651). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety (LTS) and disease control with ruxolitinib cream. METHODS: Patients initially randomized to twice-daily 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream maintained their regimen during the 44-week LTS period (as-needed treatment). Patients on vehicle were rerandomized (1:1) at week 8 to either ruxolitinib cream strength. Safety and disease control (Investigator's Global Assessment score 0/1 and affected body surface area) were assessed. RESULTS: Over 52 weeks, adverse events were reported in 67.4%/62.6%/53.5%/57.6% of patients in 0.75%/1.5% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 0.75% ruxolitinib cream/vehicle to 1.5% ruxolitinib cream groups (n = 426/446/101/99). Most common adverse events were upper respiratory tract infection (10.3%/11.4%/5.9%/7.1%) and nasopharyngitis (8.9%/9.9%/7.9%/14.1%). Most adverse events were considered unrelated to treatment. Application site reactions were infrequent (3.8%/1.8%/1.0%/1.0%). Disease control was achieved throughout the LTS; 74.1% to 77.8% of patients had Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 at week 52, and mean affected body surface area was low (1.4%-1.8%). LIMITATIONS: LTS had no control treatment. CONCLUSION: During 44 weeks of as-needed treatment, ruxolitinib cream demonstrated effective disease control and tolerability; low ruxolitinib plasma concentrations alongside safety findings reflecting known risk factors suggest physiologically meaningful systemic Janus kinase inhibition is highly unlikely.

Effect of Roflumilast Cream (ARQ-151) on Itch and Itch-Related Sleep Loss in Adults with Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: Patient-Reported Itch Outcomes of a Phase 2b Trial.

BACKGROUND: Itch is the most bothersome symptom reported by patients with psoriasis. Safe and effective treatments for psoriasis that also address itch are needed. OBJECTIVES: To report effects of roflumilast cream on itch-related outcomes from a Phase 2b trial. METHODS: Adults with chronic plaque psoriasis were randomized to roflumilast 0.3%, roflumilast 0.15%, or vehicle once-daily for 12 weeks. Psoriasis severity was assessed via the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA; a 5-point scale assessing plaque thickening, scaling, and erythema ranging from 0 [clear] to 4 [severe]) and ≥ 2 on a modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI-HD, which combines severity of lesions and area affected, ranging from 0 [no disease] to 72 [maximal disease], with the actual percentage of the anatomical area involved in those patients with < 10% of anatomical area involved [e.g., 0.1 for 1% to 0.9 for 9%]). Itch was evaluated via Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS), Psoriasis Symptom Diary (PSD) Items 1 (severity of itch) and 2 (bother of itch), and itch-related sleep loss NRS scores. Post hoc correlation analyses between WI-NRS and PASI, WI-NRS and itch-related sleep loss, and WI-NRS and DLQI were also performed. RESULTS: Roflumilast-treated patients had significantly greater improvements than vehicle-treated patients in WI-NRS and PSD Items 1 and 2 beginning at Week 2 and in itch-related sleep loss Weeks 6 through 12. Among patients with baseline WI-NRS ≥ 6, significantly more patients achieved ≥ 4-point improvement with roflumilast than with vehicle as early as Week 2. Itch severity had low correlation with PASI while WI-NRS and IGA were not always aligned. LIMITATIONS: The first assessment was at 2 weeks, limiting the ability to assess early onset of itch response. CONCLUSION: Roflumilast cream improved itch and itch-related sleep loss associated with chronic plaque psoriasis. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT03638258.

Long-term 2-year safety and efficacy of tralokinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Interim analysis of the ECZTEND open-label extension trial.

BACKGROUND: Additional long-term treatments are needed for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). An ongoing, open-label, 5-year extension trial, ECZTEND (NCT03587805), assesses tralokinumab plus optional topical corticosteroids in participants from previous tralokinumab parent trials (PTs) with moderate-to-severe AD. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of up to 2 years tralokinumab treatment in a post hoc interim analysis. METHODS: Safety analyses included adults from completed PTs enrolled in ECZTEND, regardless of tralokinumab exposure duration. Efficacy analyses included adult participants treated with tralokinumab in ECZTEND for ≥1 year and subgroup analyses of those on tralokinumab for 2 years (1 year from PT, 1 year in ECZTEND). Primary end point was the number of adverse events with additional efficacy end points. RESULTS: Participants on tralokinumab had an exposure-adjusted rate of 237.8 adverse events/100 patient-years' exposure (N = 1174) in the safety analysis set. Exposure-adjusted incidence rates of common adverse events were comparable to PTs, although at lower rates. With 2 years of tralokinumab, improvements in extent and severity of AD were sustained, with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI-75) in 82.5% of participants (N = 345). LIMITATIONS: Possible selection bias; no placebo arm; some participants experienced treatment gaps between PTs and ECZTEND. CONCLUSION: Over 2 years, tralokinumab was well tolerated and maintained long-term control of AD signs and symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib cream for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Results from 2 phase 3, randomized, double-blind studies.

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib (RUX) cream demonstrated potent anti-inflammatory and antipruritic efficacy in a phase 2 study in adults with atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 8-week efficacy and safety in 2 phase 3 studies of RUX cream in patients with AD. METHODS: Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 1 (NCT03745638) and Study 2 (NCT03745651) enrolled patients aged ≥12 years with AD for ≥2 years, an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 2/3, and 3%-20% affected body surface area. Patients were randomized 2:2:1 to twice-daily 0.75% RUX cream, 1.5% RUX cream, or vehicle cream for 8 continuous weeks. The primary endpoint was Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success at week 8 (Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0/1 and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline). RESULTS: In the Topical Ruxolitinib Evaluation in Atopic Dermatitis Study 1 and 2, 631 and 618 patients were randomized (631/577 analyzed for efficacy). Significantly more patients achieved Investigator's Global Assessment treatment success with 0.75% RUX cream (50.0%/39.0%) and 1.5% RUX cream (53.8%/51.3%) versus vehicle (15.1%/7.6%; P < .0001) at week 8. Significant itch reductions versus vehicle were reported within 12 hours of first application of 1.5% RUX (P < .05). Application site reactions were infrequent (<1%) and lower with RUX versus vehicle; none were clinically significant. LIMITATIONS: Longer-term safety data are not yet available. CONCLUSIONS: RUX cream showed anti-inflammatory and prompt antipruritic effects with superior efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated.

Ixekizumab treatment and the impact on SF-36: results from three pivotal phase III randomised controlled trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

PURPOSE: To assess improvements in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with ixekizumab treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. METHODS: Adults with plaque psoriasis were enrolled in phase III, double-blind, randomised, controlled trials (UNCOVER-1, UNCOVER-2, or UNCOVER-3). All 3 protocols included a 12-week, placebo-controlled induction period; UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 also had an active-control group (50 mg etanercept) during induction. After induction, patients in UNCOVER-1 and UNCOVER-2 entered a 48-week withdrawal (maintenance) period (Weeks 12-60), during which Week-12 sPGA (0,1) responders were rerandomized to receive placebo, or 80 mg ixekizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) or 12 weeks. As a secondary objective, HRQoL was measured by the generic Medical Outcomes Survey Short Form-36 (SF-36) at baseline and Weeks 12 and 60. Changes in mean SF-36 Physical and Mental Component Summary (PCS and MCS) and domain scores and proportions of patients reporting improvements ≥ minimal important differences in SF-36 scores were compared between groups. RESULTS: At Week 12, ixekizumab-treated patients (both dose groups in UNCOVER-1, -2, and -3) reported statistically significantly greater improvements in mean SF-36 PCS and MCS and all 8 SF-36 domain scores versus placebo. Further, more ixekizumab-treated patients than placebo-treated patients reported at least minimal treatment responses in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores and domain scores. Overall improvements in SF-36 PCS and MCS scores were maintained through Week 60. CONCLUSIONS: Ixekizumab-treated patients reported statistically significant improvements in HRQoL at 12 weeks that persisted through 1 year.

Effects of Apremilast on Pruritus and Skin Discomfort/Pain Correlate With Improvements in Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis.

Pruritus and skin discomfort/pain negatively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The effects of apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase inhibitor, on pruritus, skin discomfort/pain, and patient global assessment of psoriasis disease activity (PgAPDA) were assessed in moderate/severe chronic plaque psoriasis patients in the phase 3 ESTEEM trials. Significant improvements in pruritus and skin discomfort/pain observed at Week 2 with apremilast versus placebo (both studies, p < 0.0001) were sustained through Week 32. Among apremilast-treated patients, improvements in pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) scores correlated with Dermatology Life Quality Index scores (rs = 0.55 [Week 16], rs≥0.51 [Week 32]; both studies, p < 0.001). PgAPDA correlated with improvements in pruritus (rs≥0.56 [Week 16]; rs≥0.53 [Week 32]; both studies, p < 0.001) and skin discomfort/pain (rs ≥0.54 [Week 16]; rs≥0.53 [Week 32]; both studies, p < 0.001) VAS scores. Apremilast provided rapid and sustained improvement in pruritus and skin discomfort/pain, symptoms not typically captured in psoriasis assessments (e.g., PASI) that contribute significantly to patients' disease severity and HRQoL perceptions.

Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Early clinical studies suggested that the anti-interleukin-17 receptor A monoclonal antibody brodalumab has efficacy in the treatment of psoriasis. METHODS: In two phase 3 studies (AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3), patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive brodalumab (210 mg or 140 mg every 2 weeks), ustekinumab (45 mg for patients with a body weight ≤100 kg and 90 mg for patients >100 kg), or placebo. At week 12, patients receiving brodalumab were randomly assigned again to receive a brodalumab maintenance dose of 210 mg every 2 weeks or 140 mg every 2 weeks, every 4 weeks, or every 8 weeks; patients receiving ustekinumab continued to receive ustekinumab every 12 weeks, and patients receiving placebo received 210 mg of brodalumab every 2 weeks. The primary aims were to evaluate the superiority of brodalumab over placebo at week 12 with respect to at least a 75% reduction in the psoriasis area-and-severity index score (PASI 75) and a static physician's global assessment (sPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin), as well as the superiority of brodalumab over ustekinumab at week 12 with respect to a 100% reduction in PASI score (PASI 100). RESULTS: At week 12, the PASI 75 response rates were higher with brodalumab at the 210-mg and 140-mg doses than with placebo (86% and 67%, respectively, vs. 8% [AMAGINE-2] and 85% and 69%, respectively, vs. 6% [AMAGINE-3]; P<0.001); the rates of sPGA scores of 0 or 1 were also higher with brodalumab (P<0.001). The week 12 PASI 100 response rates were significantly higher with 210 mg of brodalumab than with ustekinumab (44% vs. 22% [AMAGINE-2] and 37% vs. 19% [AMAGINE-3], P<0.001). The PASI 100 response rates with 140 mg of brodalumab were 26% in AMAGINE-2 (P=0.08 for the comparison with ustekinumab) and 27% in AMAGINE-3 (P=0.007). Rates of neutropenia were higher with brodalumab and with ustekinumab than with placebo. Mild or moderate candida infections were more frequent with brodalumab than with ustekinumab or placebo. Through week 52, the rates of serious infectious episodes were 1.0 (AMAGINE-2) and 1.3 (AMAGINE-3) per 100 patient-years of exposure to brodalumab. CONCLUSIONS: Brodalumab treatment resulted in significant clinical improvements in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. (Funded by Amgen; AMAGINE-2 and AMAGINE-3 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01708603 and NCT01708629.).

Secukinumab retreatment-as-needed versus fixed-interval maintenance regimen for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial (SCULPTURE).

BACKGROUND: Secukinumab has demonstrated high, sustained efficacy in psoriasis to 52 weeks on a fixed-interval regimen. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare a retreatment-as-needed versus a fixed-interval regimen. METHODS: In this double-blind study, adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis were randomized 1:1 to subcutaneous secukinumab at 300 mg (n = 484) or 150 mg (n = 482) weekly from baseline until week 4, and at week 8. At week 12, patients achieving 75% or more improvement from baseline Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 75) were rerandomized to 2 dose levels of secukinumab retreatment as needed (n = 217, 300 mg; n = 206, 150 mg) or fixed interval (n = 217; n = 203). Primary end point was noninferiority of retreatment as needed versus fixed interval for maintaining PASI 75 to week 52. RESULTS: Secukinumab induced high responses by week 12 (84.4%-91.1% PASI 75 responders). From week 12 to week 52, more patients on fixed interval (78.2%, 300 mg; 62.1%, 150 mg) maintained PASI 75 versus retreatment as needed (67.7%; 52.4%); statistical noninferiority of retreatment as needed was not established. Overall safety, including very low incidences of treatment-emergent anti-drug antibodies (<0.5%), was similar between regimens. LIMITATIONS: The primary end point was developed without any known precedent. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab fixed interval showed clear benefit versus the study-specified retreatment-as-needed regimen for maintaining efficacy. Both regimens exhibited safety consistent with previous trials. The potential of retreatment as needed with secukinumab warrants further investigation.

A fixed-dose combination of adapalene 0.1%-BPO 2.5% allows an early and sustained improvement in quality of life and patient treatment satisfaction in severe acne.

INTRODUCTION: Acne has a significant negative impact on quality of life (QoL): lack of self-confidence, depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts. The objective was to assess the impact of an initial and continued therapy in severe acne patients through patient-related outcomes (PRO). METHODS: In two sequential double-blind randomized studies, patients received either adapalene 0.1% and benzoyl peroxide 2.5% (A-BPO) or vehicle, associated with doxycycline 100 mg for 12 weeks. Patients having obtained at least a good improvement according to investigator global assessment were re-randomized for a 24-week therapy with A-BPO or vehicle. PROs were assessed using the Acne-QoL and a patient treatment satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: QoL was improved at week 12 in all domains with a significant difference for the Acne-symptoms domain (p < 0.001) in favor of the A-BPO regimen. Additional 24-week A-BPO treatment showed a sustained improvement, significant (p < 0.001) for all domains except for Acne-symptoms. In the vehicle arm, QoL significantly worsened for all domains (p < 0.03). At weeks 12 and 36, a significantly higher proportion of patients receiving A-BPO vs. vehicle reported high satisfaction for five out of six treatment satisfaction items. CONCLUSIONS: The early and sustained improvement of these PROs is correlated to the fast onset of action of A-BPO, the treatment effectiveness and a good safety profile.

Assessment of the long-term safety and effectiveness of etanercept for the treatment of psoriasis in an adult population.

BACKGROUND: Etanercept is well tolerated and effective in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. However, effectiveness and safety data beyond 2.5 years have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of up to 4 years of etanercept therapy in psoriasis. METHODS: We analyzed prospective data from previous trials and open-label extensions, including 506 patients who initiated etanercept therapy in either of two phase III trials. Patients received etanercept, 25 mg twice weekly, 50 mg weekly, or 50 mg twice weekly, depending on which trial therapy was started. Dosage adjustments were allowed in open-label extensions, but no patients exceeded 50 mg twice weekly. Outcomes included change from baseline for the static Physician Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Exposure-adjusted adverse event (AE) rates were calculated. RESULTS: In all, 75.9% (95% confidence interval 67.9-84.0) and 27.8% (95% confidence interval 19.3-36.2) maintained Dermatology Life Quality Index response (≥ 5-point improvement from baseline) and static Physician Global Assessment response (clear or almost clear) at 48 months, respectively. AE and serious AE rates were 243.5 and 7.8 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. No serious AE rates exceeded 1.0 event per 100 patient-years. Overall infection and serious infection rates were 96.9 and 0.9 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. No cases of tuberculosis or lymphoma were reported. LIMITATIONS: Effectiveness data were limited to static Physician Global Assessment and Dermatology Life Quality Index scores. Analysis of AE rates was limited to available comparator databases. CONCLUSION: Etanercept demonstrated sustained effectiveness and a favorable safety profile with no cumulative toxicity for up to 4 years, representing, to our knowledge, the longest published study on etanercept use in psoriasis to date.

Quality of life in plaque psoriasis patients treated with voclosporin: a Canadian phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life assessments are important in the evaluation of new therapies for psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of voclosporin (VCS) treatment on quality of life in patients with psoriasis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 451 plaque psoriasis patients with ≥  10% body surface area involvement were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to 1 of 4 treatment groups (placebo, VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID, VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID, and VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID) for up to 12 weeks of treatment. Quality of life was assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI). RESULTS: At 12 weeks, patients treated with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significantly more favourable assessments than placebo-treated patients in all domains of the DLQI and the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.3 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 5 of 10 domains of the DLQI and all domains of the PDI. Patients treated with VCS 0.2 mg kg(-1) BID had statistically significant improvements in 4 of 10 domains of the DLQI and 2 of 4 domains of the PDI. CONCLUSION: Treatment with VCS 0.4 mg kg(-1) BID significantly improves the quality of life of patients with psoriasis.

Safety profile of intravenous and subcutaneous siplizumab, an anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Several biologics targeting different cytokines and receptors, including T-cell receptors, have been approved for psoriasis treatment. Siplizumab, a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody, may potentially provide an alternative therapy for psoriasis. Its safety profile and immunogenicity was examined in adults with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies: one tested two intravenous (I.V.) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab every 2 weeks x 8 doses (124 patients); the second study tested three subcutaneous (S.C.) dose regimens of siplizumab (5 mg x 12 weeks, 5 mg x 6 weeks + placebo x 6 weeks, 7 mg x 4 weeks + placebo x 8 weeks), and placebo x 12 weeks (420 patients). Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory values were monitored. Immunogenicity was determined by anti-siplizumab antibodies quantification. In both studies, siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile; most common AEs judged to be siplizumab related were lymphopenia, chills, and headache, reported at a higher frequency in the siplizumab-treated vs. placebo group. Siplizumab-related reductions in absolute lymphocyte count did not result in clinical evidence of immune suppression. Anti-siplizumab antibodies were detected after exposure to siplizumab; however, there was no evidence of an association between antibody development and AEs. Siplizumab exhibited an acceptable safety profile in adult patients with plaque psoriasis when administered as multiple I.V. or S.C. doses. Higher, clinically relevant doses of siplizumab would need to be tested to fully assess its safety.

Humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody treatment of plaque psoriasis: efficacy and pharmacodynamic results of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of intravenous and subcutaneous siplizumab.

New biologic therapies focused primarily on cytokine pathways, some targeting T cell-mediated immune responses, are being developed for the treatment of psoriasis. Siplizumab is a humanized anti-CD2 monoclonal antibody that interferes with costimulation necessary for T cell activation and proliferation. We assessed the biological activity, serum concentrations, and pharmacodynamic effects of siplizumab in patients with plaque psoriasis. Two multicenter, phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted: one study randomized 124 patients to one of two intravenous (IV) doses (0.012 and 0.04 mg/kg) of siplizumab, given every 2 weeks x 8 doses; the other study randomized 420 patients to one of three subcutaneous (SC) dose regimens of siplizumab given weekly (5 mg for 12 weeks, 5 mg for 6 weeks, and 7 mg for 4 weeks) or placebo for 12 weeks. Adults with plaque psoriasis involving > or =10% of the body surface area and who were not receiving psoriasis therapy were eligible. Treatment with siplizumab resulted in reductions in psoriasis severity, but most of the effects were not statistically significant compared with placebo. Statistically significant differences among IV siplizumab-treated and placebo groups were observed at study day 28, with greater psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) score reductions from baseline in the siplizumab groups. The difference in PASI50 response rates between the 0.04 mg/kg siplizumab and placebo groups was also statistically significant at day 28. A trend toward clinical improvement was observed in SC siplizumab-treated groups. Significant reductions in circulating absolute lymphocyte counts and CD2+ (CD3+, CD8+, and CD16+/56+), but not CD2- (CD19+ and CD14+), lymphocyte populations were observed. These changes were not accompanied by concomitant reductions in infiltrating CD3+ lymphocytes in psoriatic lesions, epidermal thickness, or keratin 16 (K16) and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) expression. The effect of siplizumab did not differentially affect CD45RO+ and CD45RA+ lymphocytes. Low or undetectable mean trough serum concentrations of siplizumab following IV or SC treatment were observed. Pharmacokinetic data coupled with higher-than-expected placebo clinical response rates may partly explain siplizumab's marginal clinical activity. Higher doses of siplizumab may be required to detect significant improvements in psoriasis; however, further development of this agent was not planned.

Long-term efficacy of up to 15 months' efalizumab therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis.

The efficacy and safety of efalizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe chronic psoriasis has been established in studies of up to 3 years' duration. This study aims to describe the efficacy of up to 15 months' treatment with efalizumab and the convenience of therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Patients who had completed a 3-month, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase IIIb trial entered a 12-month extension study and received efalizumab, 1 mg/kg/week administered subcutaneously, for up to 12 months. Of 450 patients originally randomly assigned to receive efalizumab, 40.9% achieved a reduction of > or = 75% in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score after 15 months of treatment. Improvements were also observed on the frequency and severity subscales of the Psoriasis Symptom Assessment. The majority of patients reported that efalizumab treatment was more or much more convenient than other psoriasis treatments. Efalizumab, 1 mg/kg/week, provides long-term efficacy and good convenience with up to 15 months of continuous treatment.

Transitioning patients from efalizumab to alternative psoriasis therapies: findings from an open-label, multicenter, Phase IIIb study.

BACKGROUND: Rebound in psoriasis is, by definition, a rapid worsening of disease following the discontinuation of therapy for psoriasis; it occurs following the abrupt discontinuation of many therapies. To prevent rebound on discontinuation of efalizumab, this study evaluated the effectiveness of transitioning patients to an alternative psoriasis therapy. METHODS: Patients (n = 130) received subcutaneous efalizumab 1 mg/kg/week for 12 weeks. Efalizumab was discontinued at 12 weeks; patients were evaluated for improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and a 12-week transition period was begun. Patients who achieved PASI improvement of 75% or more (PASI-75) at week 12 of efalizumab treatment were observed during the transition period and treated only if psoriasis recurred. Patients who did not attain PASI-75 at week 12 of efalizumab treatment were immediately transitioned to an alternative psoriasis therapy at the physician's discretion. All patients were evaluated for signs of rebound following efalizumab discontinuation. RESULTS: Rebound was not observed in any PASI-75 responder (n = 46). Rebound was observed in two of 32 patients who achieved between PASI-50 and PASI-75, and was more common in nonresponders (14/49). Rebound was observed in none of the eight patients treated with cyclosporine and in two of the 12 patients treated with methotrexate during the transition period. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that efalizumab-responsive patients are less likely to experience rebound than nonresponders and may not require treatment until disease recurrence following efalizumab discontinuation. Efalizumab nonresponders are at higher risk of developing rebound and thus should be considered for transition to an appropriate psoriasis therapy immediately following efalizumab discontinuation.

Clinical response to adalimumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis: double-blind, randomized controlled trial and open-label extension study.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor is pivotal in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Adalimumab is a fully human monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 antibody that neutralizes tumor necrosis factor. OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 147 patients received adalimumab (40 mg every other week or 40 mg/wk) or placebo. After 12 weeks of blinded therapy, patients taking adalimumab could continue their assigned dosages in a 48-week extension trial; patients taking placebo were switched to adalimumab (40 mg every other week). RESULTS: At week 12, 53% of patients taking adalimumab every other week, 80% of patients taking adalimumab weekly, and 4% of patients taking placebo achieved 75% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (P < .001). Responses were sustained for 60 weeks. No new safety signals were noted compared with the existing adalimumab clinical safety database. LIMITATIONS: The study was insufficiently powered to detect rare adverse events associated with adalimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab significantly improved psoriasis and was well tolerated for 60 weeks.

A review of malignancies observed during efalizumab (Raptiva) clinical trials for plaque psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Psoriasis is a chronic, incurable immune-mediated disease. Most therapies used for moderate to severe psoriasis are immunosuppressive. Agents that depress immune function, including traditional psoriasis therapies, have been associated with an increased incidence of malignancies. Efalizumab is a recombinant monoclonal immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody approved for use in psoriasis patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the incidence of malignancy in patients receiving efalizumab during clinical trials compared with placebo-treated patients, psoriasis patients from external cohorts and the general US population. METHODS: Patient data were pooled from multiple phase III placebo-controlled, open-label efalizumab clinical trials, and the incidence rate of reported malignancies was calculated as a function of patient years of observation. The results for the efalizumab-treated patients were compared with the data on psoriasis patients from insurance claims databases and a registry of events in the general population. RESULTS: The efalizumab- and placebo-treated patients had similar incidence rates of malignancy, including lymphoproliferative disease, solid tumor, malignant melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer. The incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, in patients receiving efalizumab or placebo was elevated relative to the external databases. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that efalizumab treatment does not increase a patient's risk for malignancy. The difference observed with nonmelanoma skin cancer may be due to biases introduced by the clinical trial methodology. Additional patient observation is necessary to ascertain whether a link exists between efalizumab therapy and nonmelanoma skin cancer above that normally observed in psoriasis patients.